Well, I sure as shit learned something yesterday…rendering video at 60 frames per second creates a LUSH product, but it’s TIME CONSUMING. Bloody hell, how do the Let’s Players of YouTube do it and put out consistent content? Eh, I’ll toy with it a bit. 🙂
My favorite set and pic of Isobel Wren today. 🙂
Tolstoy
Isobel Wren
Isobel Wren
Isobel Wren
Isobel Wren
This sounds like a question you might want to ask Patrick Norton of the TECH THING (http://www.tekthing.com/ ) and THIS WEEK IN COMPUTER HARDARE (https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-computer-hardware ) podcasts, as he does a lot of video rendering, Tony.
I assume this is for your gaming thing?
Yup; that it is. 🙂 Got some content cut, but it’s taking a dog’s age to render…I’ll try the links you suggest. 🙂
I wish I had an answer for you, Tony, but I can’t even reliably Google information.
What’s your current rig? A gaming rig should have the proper horsepower to render video, though I know Patrick Norton has often complained about comparable setups that take forever to render video for podcasts. There could be a number of bottlenecks – even the software or the settings you’re using might be a factor.
What are you currently using? I found a page that might help with the settings for YouTube’s encoder, Adobe Premiere/Media Encoder, and Handbrake. (Have you tried Handbrake for Windows, BTW?)
Sorry here’s that page – http://www.psynapticmedia.com/best-video-compression-settings-for-youtube-2015-adobe-handbrake-psynaps-settings/ .
PS: Isobel Wren cleavegagged, wearing tan pantyhose, tightly bound?
Oh, yes – that’s lovely!
PPS: It might just be a question of more RAM or a faster GPU to improve your render times…..